Skip to main content
Skip to content
Training & EnablementFast to value

AI Coding Agents Training

Hands-on training that turns developers into effective drivers of AI coding agents.

a room of desks with computers
  • Training / EnablementIndustry
  • Engineering teamsClient
  • Training & EnablementCategory
  • Fast to valueTime to impact
CH.01 · The challenge

The challenge

today
  1. Most developers have tried an AI assistant and bounced off it.
  2. Used naively it produces plausible-but-wrong code; used well it changes how a team ships.
  3. The gap is skill, not the tool.
Our answer

Hands-on training that turns developers into effective drivers of AI coding agents.

A practical programme that gets developers genuinely productive with AI coding agents, not just autocomplete, but planning, reviewing and shipping real work with an agent in the loop, the way Dypsis builds.

CH.02 · What we built

What we built

Hands-on training that turns developers into effective drivers of AI coding agents.
  1. 01Hands-on sessions built around real agent-driven workflows.
  2. 02How to spec, prompt, review and verify what an agent produces.
  3. 03Guardrails so agents raise quality instead of eroding it.
  4. 04The patterns Dypsis uses to ship production work with agents.
CH.03 · How it works

How it works

CH.04 · What it can do

What it can do

  • Agent-driven workflow

    Plan, build, review and ship with an agent in the loop.

  • Prompt & verify

    Spec well, then check what the agent produced.

  • Quality guardrails

    Keep the speed without eroding the codebase.

  • Real-world patterns

    How we actually ship with agents day to day.

CH.05 · Who stays in the loop

Who stays in the loop

The call the system deliberately does not take, and what the person is given to take it with.

Runs on its own

A practical programme that gets developers genuinely productive with AI coding agents

Who

The developer

Decideseverything the agent proposes. The training exists to make that judgement sharper

Seesthe agent’s output next to the spec it was given, and the checks that verify it

CH.06 · The payoff

The payoff

What is different once it is running. No invented numbers: these are the changes the work was built to make.

Your developers stop fighting the tools and start shipping with an agent in the loop, the same way we build.
  • Developers who can spec an agent, then review and verify what it produces.

  • Guardrails in place, so the speed does not cost the codebase.

  • The same patterns Dypsis uses to ship production work with agents.

CH.07 · Built with

Built with

The layers this runs on, from what comes in to what it plugs into.

  1. Model layer
    • AI coding agents
  2. Runs on
    • Claude Code
  3. Method
    • Hands-on labs
CH.08 · Common questions

Common questions

The same answers as above, written out.

A practical programme that gets developers genuinely productive with AI coding agents, not just autocomplete, but planning, reviewing and shipping real work with an agent in the loop, the way Dypsis builds.

Most developers have tried an AI assistant and bounced off it. Used naively it produces plausible-but-wrong code; used well it changes how a team ships. The gap is skill, not the tool.

Developers work through real tasks with an agent. They learn to spec, review and verify its output. They leave shipping faster, with guardrails in place.

The developer decides everything the agent proposes. The training exists to make that judgement sharper. They see the agent’s output next to the spec it was given, and the checks that verify it.

Model layer: AI coding agents. Runs on: Claude Code. Method: Hands-on labs.

Developers who can spec an agent, then review and verify what it produces. Guardrails in place, so the speed does not cost the codebase. The same patterns Dypsis uses to ship production work with agents.

Start

Bring us the problem nobody has cracked yet.

We are a small team of senior specialists. We pick the right model and the right layer, and we build the least machinery that does the job. You get a call with an engineer, not a sales deck.