Skip to main content
Skip to content
Automation & OptimizationFast to value

AI-Augmented Engineering

A private plugin toolchain so every project plans, reviews, tests, ships and recovers the same way.

an editor with markup on screen
  • Developer toolingIndustry
  • Engineering teamsClient
  • Automation & OptimizationCategory
  • Fast to valueTime to impact
CH.01 · The challenge

The challenge

today
  1. On a fast-moving team, everyone plans, reviews, tests and releases slightly differently.
  2. That inconsistency is where defects, slow reviews and messy incidents creep in.
Our answer

A private plugin toolchain so every project plans, reviews, tests, ships and recovers the same way.

An internal toolchain of Claude Code plugins covering the whole software lifecycle, spec, review, test, ship, operate, on a shared foundation of voice, security and brand standards, so every project is built to one bar without each engineer reinventing the process.

CH.02 · What we built

What we built

A private plugin toolchain so every project plans, reviews, tests, ships and recovers the same way.
  1. 01Plugins cover each lifecycle stage: spec, review, test, ship, operate.
  2. 02Specs, PRDs and ADRs are written before code.
  3. 03Diffs are reviewed against one shared standard; releases are semver and rollback-first.
  4. 04A shared foundation enforces voice, security and brand across everything produced.
CH.03 · How it works

How it works

CH.04 · What it can do

What it can do

  • Spec-driven dev

    PRDs and ADRs before any code is written.

  • Standardised review

    Every diff checked against one quality bar.

  • Ship & operate

    Semver releases, rollback-first, blameless postmortems.

  • Shared foundation

    Voice, security and brand baked into every output.

CH.05 · Who stays in the loop

Who stays in the loop

The call the system deliberately does not take, and what the person is given to take it with.

Runs on its own

An internal toolchain of Claude Code plugins covering the whole software lifecycle

Who

The reviewing engineer

Decideswhether a diff merges

Seesthe change reviewed against one shared standard, with the spec it was written from

CH.06 · The payoff

The payoff

What is different once it is running. No invented numbers: these are the changes the work was built to make.

Quality stops depending on which engineer picked up the ticket. Every project plans, reviews, ships and recovers the same way.
  • A consistent quality bar across every project.

  • Less reinventing process, more shipping.

  • Incidents handled calmly, with a blameless playbook.

CH.07 · Built with

Built with

The layers this runs on, from what comes in to what it plugs into.

  1. Runs on
    • Claude Code plugins
    • Git / PR workflow
    • CI/CD
CH.08 · Common questions

Common questions

The same answers as above, written out.

An internal toolchain of Claude Code plugins covering the whole software lifecycle, spec, review, test, ship, operate, on a shared foundation of voice, security and brand standards, so every project is built to one bar without each engineer reinventing the process.

On a fast-moving team, everyone plans, reviews, tests and releases slightly differently. That inconsistency is where defects, slow reviews and messy incidents creep in.

Start from a spec or PRD plugin. Build, review and test against shared standards. Ship with semver and a rollback-first deploy.

The reviewing engineer decides whether a diff merges. They see the change reviewed against one shared standard, with the spec it was written from.

Runs on: Claude Code plugins, Git / PR workflow, CI/CD.

A consistent quality bar across every project. Less reinventing process, more shipping. Incidents handled calmly, with a blameless playbook.

Start

Bring us the problem nobody has cracked yet.

We are a small team of senior specialists. We pick the right model and the right layer, and we build the least machinery that does the job. You get a call with an engineer, not a sales deck.